Debate: Hamza Hitch VS Michael Sartain
Hamza Hitch went head to head with Michael Sartain (Men Of Action) in Game Global’s second debate between cold approach and social circle game.
Hamza Hitch VS Michael Sartain
Ice White hosted a friendly debate with Hamza Hitch and some of his students, up against Michael Sartain and some of his Men Of Action students.
The debate is a follow up to the first debate between Markus Wolf, Hamza Hitch and Michael Sartain.
The Case For Cold Approach: Hamza Hitch
- Rejection: You as a person are not being rejected, it’s your approach and behavior being rejected
- Value Proposition: You hold the value, not the event, events shouldn’t be a crutch
- Maximizing Results: Combine cold approach with social circle game
- Meeting Women: You can approach women anywhere
- Time Allocation: You can meet women on your own time, at your own convenience and around what you’re doing in your life
- Travel: You can cold approach women anywhere you travel to
- Events: Events shouldn’t be a crutch for meeting women
The Case For Social Circle Game: Michael Sartain
- Rejection: Cold approach guys deny rejection too much rather than making improvements based on feedback
- Value Proposition: Display access to scarce resources as a cheat code for attraction and show high levels of status with low perceived effort
- Maximizing Results: Work on your social media game and use female friends as your team members
- Meeting Women: Social circle game is networking while networking, you can have women introduce you to more women
- Time Allocation: Setting up a social circle can take 3 hours a week
- Travel: Your value on social media carries with you everywhere you go and opens up more social circles
- Events: Social circle events don’t need to be complicated, you can have group get-togethers like playing Never Have I Ever
Who Won?
To vote the winner of the debate, head to the comments section.
